Re: extension of file-test primitives?

[Dethrophes]

>
>> Which I always understood as the correct way of doing this in the
>first place...
>
>It's not as good as multiple test commands: test -f file && test -x
>file.
>There's no ambiguity and you get short-circuiting.

Only if you are using the test built-in, otherwise the latter means 2 
spawns/forks however the shell in question calls the test exec.


-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.