[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Function definitions

From: Chet Ramey
Subject: Re: Function definitions
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:32:41 -0500

> Chet Ramey <address@hidden> writes:

> Thank you for an explanation. My takeaway is that most, if not all,
> [kaz]sh descendants[1] allow something that IEEE Std 1003.1-2008, 2016
> Edition doesn't.

Yep, nothing wrong with that. All shells include extensions beyond what
Posix specifies.

``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    address@hidden    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]