[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles

From: Chet Ramey
Subject: Re: "here strings" and tmpfiles
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:28:21 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 4/9/19 11:25 AM, konsolebox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:28 PM Chet Ramey <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 4/9/19 10:10 AM, konsolebox wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:19 PM Greg Wooledge <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Just like that one time L. Walsh tried to write a bash boot script that
>>>> used <() to populate an array, and it failed because she was running
>>>> it too early in the boot sequence, and /dev/fd/ wasn't available yet.
>>> @Chet, Isn't bash supposed to use named pipes alternatively, and
>>> dynamically?
>> No. It's a build-time decision, and /dev/fd is preferred.
> Why not make it load-time at least?  

Maybe someday, but it's extremely low priority.

``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    address@hidden    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]