Re: loadables/rm not POSIX compliant

[Tim Rühsen]

On 5/29/19 12:53 PM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> On 5/28/19 6:04 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>> At 2019-05-28T17:01:52+0200, Tim Rühsen wrote:
>>> Since distributions like Debian doesn't deliver binaries from
>>> examples/,
>>
>> That doesn't sound accurate to me.  The Debian Policy Manual, §12.6,
>> encourages the shipping of examples:
>>
>> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#examples
>>
>> In fact, the bash-doc package contains dozens of examples.  However, I
>> don't see anything named "rm".  (I'm looking at bash-doc 5.0-4 in Debian
>> 10, "buster".)
> 
> That package does not contain examples/loadables. But there is a package
> 'bash-builtins' which doesn't contain 'rm' and 'cat' either.
> 
> Opening a new bug report via 'reportbug' seems to trigger another Debian
> bug. You can see the bug entry at
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?dist=unstable;package=bash-builtins
> (#929702), but clicking on it gives "There is no record of Bug #929702".

The link now works
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929702). It took a
while, I was too impatient.

Regards, Tim

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature