[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:53:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN] |
> On 2020-04-11 at 18:04 +0200, gentoo_eshoes wrote:
>> $ echo ${PS1@A}
>> declare -x PS1=$'\\\n-----------\\n\\\n\\[\\a\\]\\\n\\[\\e[1;37m\
>> \e[42m\\]\\u@\\H\\[\\e[0m\\] \\\n\\[\\033[1;30m\\]$(date "+%Y/%m/%d %
>> H:%M:%S")\\[\\033[0m\\] \\\n\\[\\e[0;37m\\]\\s\\V t:\\l j:\\j \\\nd:
>> ${SHLVL} pp:${PPID} p:$$ ut`cat /proc/uptime | cut -f1 -d.`\\[\\e[0m\
>> \]\\n\\\n\\[\\e[0;37m\\]!\\!\\[\\e[0m\\] \\\n\\[\\033[0;36m\\]\\#\\[\
>> \033[0m\\] \\\n$(evalexitcode "${__earlyec[@]}" ) \\\n\\[\\e[0m\
>> \]$(uname -r) $(uname -v)\n$(ps_lepath "\\w")\\[ \\033];\\w\\a\\]\n\
>> \[\\e[1;32m\\]\\$\\[\\e[0m\\] \\\n'
>
>
> That was an⦠'interesting' prompt.
>
> Note that there are several subprocesses that you could easily avoid:
>
> $(date "+%Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S") is equivalent to \D{%Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S}
>
>
> `cat /proc/uptime | cut -f1 -d.` this could be simplified to `cut -f1 -d.
> /proc/uptime`
> it may be replaced with just builtins by `uptime=$(</proc/uptime); builtin
> echo ${uptime/.*}`
>
> $(uname -r) $(uname -v) is equivalent to $(uname -r -v) I wonder why you
> need these fairly static values on every prompt line, though.
More generally, a loadable module command can do whatever you want, and
that's going to be more efficient than any subprocess fork and exec.
- Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste, Chet Ramey, 2020/04/12
- Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste, gentoo_eshoes, 2020/04/12
- Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste, Chet Ramey, 2020/04/12
- Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste, Daniel Colascione, 2020/04/12
- Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste, gentoo_eshoes, 2020/04/13
- Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste, Chet Ramey, 2020/04/13
- Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste, Ángel, 2020/04/15
- Re: [PATCH] Add active mark, face support; activate mark on paste,
Daniel Colascione <=