[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:55:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 12:47:58AM +0700, pepa65 wrote:
> It is otherwise very hard to get command output into a variable without
> a subshell.
It's not hard at all. People just have a deep, almost religious, loathing
against creating their own temp files.
And yet, these same people are *perfectly* happy if some tool creates
a temp file for them -- as long as they don't have to see any of the
details or do any of the work.
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, (continued)
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Léa Gris, 2021/01/25
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Chet Ramey, 2021/01/25
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Greg Wooledge, 2021/01/25
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Chet Ramey, 2021/01/25
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, pepa65, 2021/01/26
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Oğuz, 2021/01/26
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, pepa65, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing,
Greg Wooledge <=
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Léa Gris, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Léa Gris, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, pepa65, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Ángel, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, pepa65, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, William Park, 2021/01/22