[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Likely Bash bug

From: David
Subject: Re: Likely Bash bug
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 23:37:32 +1100

On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 23:05, Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:59:42AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:

> >   | Operating system is BionicPup64 8.0.

> > That might.   More importantly is probably whatever package management
> > system it uses.   I have no idea what the "ash" the bug report refers to
> > is (there is an ancient shell of that name, but I cannot imagine any
> > distribution including that, instead of one of its bug fixed and updated
> > successors, like say, dash)

> "ash" is often secret code for "busybox sh".

> In this specific case, I'm not sure *what* it is.  I googled a few things
> and came up with this page:

> http://wikka.puppylinux.com/Ash

That page was last edited in 2011.

The package list for BionicPup64 8.0 (or other versions) can be found here:

Looks like the provided shells are bash 4.4.18 and busybox 1.29.3

But I wonder if this bug is reproducible even by the reporter.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]