[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GROUPS
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: GROUPS |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:22:29 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 |
On 8/9/21 10:00 PM, Franklin, Jason wrote:
> If I run a script against a POSIX-compliant (PC) shell using only PC
> syntax/features and then I run the same script with Bash in PC mode, I
> would expect an identical result. To me, anything else indicates a bug
> in one of the shells. Perhaps this assessment is naive.
If the script uses only features specified by POSIX, it's a reasonable
expectation. If it uses features that POSIX doesn't mention -- and every
shell has them -- it's not. In this case, you are using features outside
what POSIX specifies. Since GROUPS has no standard behavior, each shell is
free to make it special (bash) or not (dash).
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- GROUPS, Franklin, Jason, 2021/08/09
- Re: GROUPS, Greg Wooledge, 2021/08/09
- Re: GROUPS, Franklin, Jason, 2021/08/09
- Re: GROUPS, Chet Ramey, 2021/08/11
- Re: GROUPS, Robert Elz, 2021/08/11
- Re: GROUPS, Chet Ramey, 2021/08/11
- Re: GROUPS, Robert Elz, 2021/08/12
Re: GROUPS, Chet Ramey, 2021/08/10