[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GROUPS
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: GROUPS |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Aug 2021 10:32:42 -0400 |
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 10:10:42AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> As long as you stick to things POSIX standardizes. Relevant here, the
> standard even includes a list of variables you should avoid using because
> various shells and applications use them.
Just out of curiosity, where is that? It's not under section
2.5.3 Shell Variables, which is where I looked first.
The closest thing I could find is a section in the Rationale that
describes some variables that are no longer covered by the standard,
but either used to be, or are commonly used as extensions:
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/xrat/V4_xcu_chap02.html#tag_23_02_05_03
Is there another section that I've missed?
> Obviously not, since they never tested it on bash. It's more likely they
> expected it to run on Debian's /bin/sh -- hence the hashbang -- which is
> dash.
For the record, Debian uses dash as /bin/sh by default in modern versions,
but historically, it used bash. And it still offers the user a supported
means of switching "back" to bash as /bin/sh, for systems that require it.
A Debian shell script which uses #!/bin/sh should be written to work
under bash *or* dash (at the very minimum). If it fails under either
of those shells, it's a bug.
- Re: GROUPS, (continued)
- Re: GROUPS, Chet Ramey, 2021/08/10
- Re: GROUPS, Franklin, Jason, 2021/08/10
- Re: GROUPS, Franklin, Jason, 2021/08/11
- Re: GROUPS, Greg Wooledge, 2021/08/11
- Re: GROUPS, Chet Ramey, 2021/08/13
- Re: GROUPS,
Greg Wooledge <=
- Re: GROUPS, Chet Ramey, 2021/08/13
- Re: GROUPS, Franklin, Jason, 2021/08/13
- Re: GROUPS, Dale R. Worley, 2021/08/16
- Re: GROUPS, Robert Elz, 2021/08/17
- Re: GROUPS, Dale R. Worley, 2021/08/20