[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be
From: |
Lawrence Velázquez |
Subject: |
Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem. |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:18:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-4586-g104bd556f9-fm-20220203.002-g104bd556 |
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022, at 11:53 PM, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 12:02 AM Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> wrote:
>> There are other programming languages besides bash. Some of them can
>> store NUL bytes internally, either by encoding and decoding them on the
>> fly, or by not using C-style strings internally (which means any system
>> calls require encoding/decoding the internal strings to C-style strings).
>
> i am not sure, but, tell me
> 'c strings' is a problem due to internal function handling with static \0 eof
> while 'c strings' can store null bytes no ? ( tell me if this is true
> or not plz )
It is not true. C strings are terminated by NUL.
> then if, its up to the coding buddies to self code
How generous of you to volunteer other people's time and effort.
> its so simple:
> you have always static length strings simply, u conunt and know the
> length of every msg used, and so u can separate right
> isnt it so simple ?
It's so simple that you should have no problem converting the entire
bash codebase to Pascal-style strings yourself. We'll wait.
>> I urge you to learn one of these other languages, and use it.
>
> i cant read others docs it seems buddy, it budds mee, its like the web
> docs about shell scripting, as you i and i wrote on our pages, its
> very invalid
> and so i cant learn a new language sorry
Tragic.
--
vq
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., (continued)
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Frank Heckenbach, 2022/02/06
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Chet Ramey, 2022/02/06
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/02/06
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Greg Wooledge, 2022/02/06
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/02/06
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem.,
Lawrence Velázquez <=
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/02/07
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Lawrence Velázquez, 2022/02/07
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/02/07
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Ángel, 2022/02/07
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/02/07
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Robert Elz, 2022/02/06
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Chet Ramey, 2022/02/06
- Re: Corrupted multibyte characters in command substitutions fixes may be worse than problem., Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2022/02/06