[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unset does not remove functions like a[b] unless -f is specified
From: |
Dale R. Worley |
Subject: |
Re: unset does not remove functions like a[b] unless -f is specified |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2023 15:02:41 -0500 |
Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> writes:
> I'd be totally OK with restricting the function namespace a bit more.
> Function names should not be allowed to contain backticks or less-than
> or greater-than signs (in my opinion). I'm still undecided about
> parentheses, but I'm leaning toward "denied".
I'd be perfectly fine if function names had to be "names", and my memory
is that old versions of Bash enforced that. But the manual page hints
that was changed, and probably for a reason. So proceed with caution.
When in posix mode,
fname must be a valid shell name and may not be the name of one
of the POSIX special builtins. In default mode, a function
name can be any unquoted shell word that does not contain $.
Dale
- Re: unset does not remove functions like a[b] unless -f is specified, Martin D Kealey, 2023/02/02
- Re: unset does not remove functions like a[b] unless -f is specified, Chet Ramey, 2023/02/03
- Re: unset does not remove functions like a[b] unless -f is specified, Robert Elz, 2023/02/03
- Re: unset does not remove functions like a[b] unless -f is specified, Chet Ramey, 2023/02/03
- Re: unset does not remove functions like a[b] unless -f is specified, Koichi Murase, 2023/02/03