Re: unset does not remove functions like a[b] unless -f is specified

[Koichi Murase]

2023年2月5日(日) 4:48 Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>:
> I would be interested in the outcome of a discussion like this on the
> austin-group-l mailing list. I very much doubt this would happen, but
> anything's possible.

Thank you. I'm thinking of opening a discussion there.

In the previous time that I raised the discussion about ``no-argument
return in trap handlers'', I directly posted an email to the mailing
list [1]. Fortunately, I got about ten replies but later,
unfortunately, it was finally forgotten without any conclusion.

[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/austin-group-l@opengroup.org/msg06011.html

So, this time, I am thinking of trying to submit it to the issue
tracker. The present discussion about the function name is not really
a bug of the standard, but there seem to be also questions about the
standard in the issue list, so I guess I can also submit a discussion
with a possible change for marking it as `unspecified'. However, it
seems I need a separate account in the tracker to create an issue in
the tracker, and I need to contact the Austin Group Chair to apply for
the account. I'll contact the chair, but it might take some time to
get an account and open an issue.

[2] https://www.opengroup.org/austin/

--
Koichi