[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX
|
From: |
Chet Ramey |
|
Subject: |
Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX |
|
Date: |
Fri, 31 Mar 2023 14:29:50 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 |
On 3/30/23 12:51 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It could very well mean that all shells are implementing POSIX wrong.
Except zsh.
No, interpretations have confirmed that not generating a final empty field
is correct. It's just not clear enough in the text.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, (continued)
- Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, Oğuz İsmail Uysal, 2023/03/30
- Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, Felipe Contreras, 2023/03/30
- Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri, 2023/03/30
- Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, Oğuz İsmail Uysal, 2023/03/30
- Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, Felipe Contreras, 2023/03/30
- Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, Lawrence Velázquez, 2023/03/30
- Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, Chet Ramey, 2023/03/31
- Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, Andreas Schwab, 2023/03/30
- Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX,
Chet Ramey <=
Re: IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, Chet Ramey, 2023/03/31
IFS field splitting doesn't conform with POSIX, Felipe Contreras, 2023/03/30