On Wed, 17 May 2023 at 20:20, Oğuz İsmail Uysal
<oguzismailuysal@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/16/23 8:35 PM, Aleksey Covacevice wrote:
[original code elided as it's been mangled by line-wrapping]
This boils down to the following
true &
false &
wait -n
With respect, I disagree with that statement of equivalence.
The only way for the loop to terminate is when `wait` returns 127,
after both children have been reaped.
By when the non-zero exit status of "false" will have been noted, and
then used as the return value of the function.