[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: +=() can be used to set illegal indices
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: +=() can be used to set illegal indices |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:16:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 |
On 6/29/23 6:24 AM, Emanuele Torre wrote:
The fix in the most recent push did not fix the issue:
$ x=([9223372036854775805]=foo)
$ x+=( {1..5} )
$ echo "${x[@]}"
3 4 5 foo 1 2
It behaves exactly the same way: no error is printed, some elements are
prepended instead of appended, and there are invalid indices in the
output of declare -p .
Thanks, good catch. The check really needs to be in the loop that goes
through the words in the compound assignment.
What I would have expected was something like this:
$ x=([9223372036854775805]=foo)
$ x+=( {1..5} ); echo "this won't run"
bash: some "invalid assignment" error
$ declare -p x # no value gets appended since there was an error
No. Why wouldn't the valid assignments be accepted? If you want
a=(1 2 3)
to be as close as possible to
a[0]=1
a[1]=2
a[2]=3
you have to do it that way.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/