[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc-strings of the 'command' built-in, as output by help
From: |
Robert Elz |
Subject: |
Re: doc-strings of the 'command' built-in, as output by help |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:30:37 +0700 |
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:23:56 +1000
From: Martin D Kealey <martin@kurahaupo.gen.nz>
Message-ID:
<CAN_U6MX2++5WvEn+b8FjGJK-4vsuTwdXrvQ0OZAmRTP5xQ+gng@mail.gmail.com>
| I'm not convinced that ‘command’ should mention aliases at all, since
| ‘command -v "$var"’ should tell you what ‘"$var"’ will do.
| What it *won't* do is be expanded as an alias.
Absolute nonsense. Once again you seem to either have no idea how shells
work, or are attempting to redefine them to suit your desire for how they
should work.
Given
var=foo
There is literally no difference between
command -v "$var"
and
command -v foo
when "command" runs. And if earlier foo had been defined as
alias foo='ls -F'
then both forms will tell you that foo is an alias.
kre
- doc-strings of the 'command' built-in, as output by help, Andrew Davis, 2024/11/25
- Re: doc-strings of the 'command' built-in, as output by help, Chet Ramey, 2024/11/25
- Re: doc-strings of the 'command' built-in, as output by help, Martin D Kealey, 2024/11/25
- Re: doc-strings of the 'command' built-in, as output by help, Oğuz, 2024/11/25
- Re: doc-strings of the 'command' built-in, as output by help, Andrew Davis, 2024/11/26