[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EP9312, Maverick Crunch fixes

From: Petko Manolov
Subject: Re: EP9312, Maverick Crunch fixes
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:50:54 +0200 (EET)

        Hi Nick,

This is the patch with ChangeLog and testsuite changes as requested.  It's
generated against the latest CVS code so i hope it'll apply easily.

Please let me know if i need to change anything else.


On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Nick Clifton wrote:

> Hi Petko,
> > I am not sure who i need to contact so i'm sending the patch to both
> > lists.
> Both lists are used by the binutils project, so sending to either one
> is OK.
> > We've fixed some bugs in Maverick Crunch coprocessor opcode
> > generation in gas.  These fixes now allow code compiled for ep9312
> > (silicon revision D0 and D1, i.e. the latest as of now) to run
> > properly on the target.  The patch is generated against CVS code
> > from 2004-02-05.
> Thanks for submitting this patch.  Is there a document describing the
> D0 and D1 revisions ?  (I only have access to revision 1.0 of the
> Maverick ISA description and I would like to know if there is a newer
> version available).
> > Please let me know if the patch doesn't comply with the binutils
> > coding standards or something needs to be redone.
> Actually the patch is fine although it was missing a couple of things:
>   - a set of ChangeLog entries describing the fixes that have been
>     applied.
>   - a patch to the gas testsuite to update the Maverick instruction
>     tests.
> It is also worth noting that although is covered by the obvious-change
> rule and does not need a copyright assignment, if it had been any
> bigger it would have needed one.
> > Sorry about the group email, but i don't know who's the official
> > maintainer(s).
> The maintainers are listed in the file binutils/MAINTAINERS.  Since
> the Maverick is an ARM coprocessor you could have addressed this email
> to either myself or Richard Earnshaw, but in any case, sending to the
> list is the correct thing to do, so that everybody is kept informed.
> If you can submit a revised patch with a set of ChangeLog entries and
> a fix to the gas testsuite, I will be happy to apply it.
> Cheers
>         Nick

Attachment: maverick.diff
Description: Text document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]