[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/287] "multiple definition" symbol error on some systems, not oth
From: |
kpfleming at linuxfromscratch dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/287] "multiple definition" symbol error on some systems, not others |
Date: |
26 Jul 2004 07:38:44 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From kpfleming at linuxfromscratch dot org
2004-07-26 07:38 -------
I believe I'm going to volutarily withdraw this bug report... we have a theory
that explains the behavior, and it is in no way the fault of binutils.
See:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-hackers/2004-July/001798.html
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=287
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/287] New: "multiple definition" symbol error on some systems, not others, kpfleming at linuxfromscratch dot org, 2004/07/24
- [Bug ld/287] "multiple definition" symbol error on some systems, not others, kpfleming at linuxfromscratch dot org, 2004/07/24
- [Bug ld/287] "multiple definition" symbol error on some systems, not others, hjl at lucon dot org, 2004/07/25
- [Bug ld/287] "multiple definition" symbol error on some systems, not others, kpfleming at linuxfromscratch dot org, 2004/07/26
- [Bug ld/287] "multiple definition" symbol error on some systems, not others,
kpfleming at linuxfromscratch dot org <=