[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug gas/396] New: cannot assemble sparclet files

From: luke at diamand dot org
Subject: [Bug gas/396] New: cannot assemble sparclet files
Date: 21 Sep 2004 10:06:55 -0000

If you try to compile with -Wa,-Asparclet using gcc, then the assembler will
abort on some files (those using sparclet insns?), reporting:

BFD 2.13 internal error, aborting at
           arc.c line 2091 in elf32_sparc_final_write_processing

(This is in binutils 2.13, but it also happens in binutils 2.15, but at a
different line number - I just happen to be testing with 2.13 today).

It seems to be missing a clause in the switch statement in

My naive fix is just to add:

    case bfd_mach_sparc_sparclet :

as per the context-diff at the end of this report. I don't know enough about
binutils to know if this is the correct way to fix this problem though.

Index: elf32-sparc.c
RCS file: /cvsroot/isos_tools/source/gnu/binutils-2.13/bfd/elf32-sparc.c,v
retrieving revision
diff -c -r1.1.1.1 elf32-sparc.c
*** elf32-sparc.c       17 Mar 2003 14:25:40 -0000
--- elf32-sparc.c       21 Sep 2004 10:06:06 -0000
*** 2066,2071 ****
--- 2066,2072 ----
    switch (bfd_get_mach (abfd))
      case bfd_mach_sparc :
+     case bfd_mach_sparc_sparclet :
        break; /* nothing to do */
      case bfd_mach_sparc_v8plus :
        elf_elfheader (abfd)->e_machine = EM_SPARC32PLUS;

           Summary: cannot assemble sparclet files
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.15
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gas
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: luke at diamand dot org
                CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: sparc-elf32


------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]