bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug ld/2443] New: Dwarf support in ld is broken


From: hjl at lucon dot org
Subject: [Bug ld/2443] New: Dwarf support in ld is broken
Date: 10 Mar 2006 19:32:27 -0000

address@hidden binutils]$  gcc -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Werror -g -O2 -o nm-new nm.o budemang.o bucomm.o version.o filemode.o 
../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a -B./
./ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number).
./ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number).
./ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number).
./ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number).
./ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number).
./ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number).
./ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number).
./ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number).
./ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number).
./ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section (bad file number).
bucomm.o: In function
`make_tempname':/export/gnu/src/binutils-import/binutils/binutils/bucomm.c:426:
warning: the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'

-- 
           Summary: Dwarf support in ld is broken
           Product: binutils
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ld
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
                CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2443

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]