[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong
From: |
Ian Lance Taylor |
Subject: |
Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong |
Date: |
24 Jun 2006 21:35:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
Airr <address@hidden> writes:
> As of late yesterday evening, we've been able to get this to work by
> linking the .obj (PE/COFF) files with ld emitting a PE executable, and
> then using objcopy to convert to the final ELF executable.
Yes, that is the usual technique. Of course it only works with a
fully statically linked program.
> So, is it safe to assume that attempting the conversion using ld alone
> will not produce a working ELF file in our case? That instead we
> should use objcopy to produce the final file?
Yes.
Ian
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, (continued)
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Ian Lance Taylor, 2006/06/23
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Eric Botcazou, 2006/06/24
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, doctor electron, 2006/06/24
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Eric Botcazou, 2006/06/24
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, doctor electron, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Eric Botcazou, 2006/06/24
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, doctor electron, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Eric Botcazou, 2006/06/24
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Ian Lance Taylor, 2006/06/24
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Airr, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong,
Ian Lance Taylor <=
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, doctor electron, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, doctor electron, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Ian Lance Taylor, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, doctor electron, 2006/06/25
- Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, Ian Lance Taylor, 2006/06/26
Re: BUG elf32-i386 R_386_PC32 done wrong, doctor electron, 2006/06/24