[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: relocation entries for absolute symbols
From: |
Vivek Goyal |
Subject: |
Re: relocation entries for absolute symbols |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:44:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 03:20:53PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Amit Gud <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I'm compiling the GNU/Linux kernel as a shared library and I've found
> > that relocation entries are created even for absolute symbols. Is
> > there any work-around for this, or is it a known bug?
>
> That is correct behaviour if the symbol is globally visible. In a
> shared library, by default, any symbol may be overridden by the main
> executable. That means that a relocation entry is required.
>
I am compiling my kernel with option --pic-executable to ld. As per ld
man page, symbols defined in the executable can not be overriden. Still
I see the relocation entries of type R_386_32 for absolute symbols.
c0100018 00003e01 R_386_32 c0412000 __bss_start
c010001d 00003601 R_386_32 c04d7768 __bss_stop
c0100064 00004901 R_386_32 c04d8000 pg0
c0100848 00004501 R_386_32 c03dc040 jiffies
If absolute symbols are not to be relocated then why is linker generating
relocation entries.
Then I used options "--pic-executable -Bsymbolic". In this case
also linker generated relocation entries for absolute sysmbols. Only
difference was that relocation type was R_386_RELATIVE and linker
had already processed the relocations for absolute sysmbols.
c0100018 00000008 R_386_RELATIVE
Addr c0100018 belongs to absolute symbol referece (_bss_start) in code.
In this case if absolute symbols relocation have already been processed
and absolute symbols have no more to be relocated then why
a R_386_RELATIVE entry is being generated.
My basic goal is to build dynamically relocatable kernel. I thought that
I can use the relocation information and relocate the kernel. But the
relocation entries generated for absolute symbols as shown above spoil
the whole approach.
Is it a bug? or expected behaviour?
Thanks
Vivek
- Re: relocation entries for absolute symbols,
Vivek Goyal <=