[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax
From: |
jbeulich at novell dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax |
Date: |
7 Feb 2007 15:03:47 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From jbeulich at novell dot com 2007-02-07 15:03
-------
The first case must be accepted, since masm allows this as long as the pointer
width specified matches the register width. masm fails when the latter isn't
true, while gas emit a warning only. I don't think that's a problem, though.
As to whether the noprefix handling is correct the way it currently is - that
doesn't depend on Intel mode only, as the register parsing logic is, afaics, the
same in both AT&T and Intel modes. Generally I would say current behavior is
wrong at least in Intel mode, but someone with more profound AT&T syntax
knowledge would need to clarify whether this should be changed for both modes or
just for Intel.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3993
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug gas/3993] New: Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax,
jbeulich at novell dot com <=
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2007/02/07
- [Bug gas/3993] Assembler accepts extra qualifer in Intel syntax, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/02/07