bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Results for binutils-2.17cvs20070426 (Debian Patches) testsuite on i


From: Nick Clifton
Subject: Re: Results for binutils-2.17cvs20070426 (Debian Patches) testsuite on i686-pc-linux
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:11:26 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070301)

Hi Rob,

I hope it is OK to file bug reports this way. I couldn't see a bug report script so I used the one from GCC.

We generally use bugzilla for filing binutils bug reports:

   http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/

You do not actually say what bug you are reporting. Presumably you consider the testsuite failures to be bugs, yes ?

FAIL: windres/bmpalign (parse)

This failure should now be resolved.

  === ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 309
# of unexpected failures 103

I am now showing 8 unexpected failures for an x86_64-linux-gnulibc toolchain based on today's gcc and binutils sources.

Compiler version: gcc 4.2.0 20070501 (prerelease)
Binutils version:  binutils-2.17cvs20070426
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --enable-64-bit-bfd --enable-shared --enable-targets=i686-pc-linux-gnu,x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,i686-pc-cygwin,arm-epoc-pe,arm-none-symbianelf
,arm-none-eabi

This is a complicated set of targets. Is there any particular reason for them ?

I applied this patch:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.17cvs20070426-6.diff.gz

I tried to look at this patch but it was not available for download from that URL. What does it do ?

Cheers
  Nick




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]