bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/5146] bfd build fails in alloca-conf.h when built without


From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: [Bug binutils/5146] bfd build fails in alloca-conf.h when built without gcc
Date: 28 Dec 2007 19:55:55 -0000

------- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-12-28 
19:55 -------
Native build with gcc 4.2.2 on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 fails:

/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/bf
d -I. -DHOST_HPPAHPUX -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DHPUX_CORE  -DHPUX_LARGE_AR_IDS -I.
 -I../../src/bfd -I../../src/bfd/../include     -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wm
issing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c -o elf64-hppa.lo ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c
libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/bfd -I. -DHOST_HPPAHPUX -
D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DHPUX_CORE -DHPUX_LARGE_AR_IDS -I. -I../../src/bfd -I../..
/src/bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g
 -O2 -c ../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c  -DPIC -o .libs/elf64-hppa.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c: In function 'allocate_global_data_opd':
../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c:1189: warning: implicit declaration of function 'allo
ca'
../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c:1189: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of b
uilt-in function 'alloca'
../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c: In function 'elf64_hppa_finalize_opd':
../../src/bfd/elf64-hppa.c:2189: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of b
uilt-in function 'alloca'
make[4]: *** [elf64-hppa.lo] Error 1


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5146

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]