[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Correct ELF machine for coldfire?
|
From: |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
|
Subject: |
Re: Correct ELF machine for coldfire? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:22:17 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) |
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 02:32:46PM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>> We are compiling for Coldfire CFV4E target. Binutils seems to want to
>> set the ELF header em_machine field to EM_68K with about half a dozen
>> options set to indicate instruction set and so forth.
>>
>> Should this be getting set to EM_COLDFIRE, or is the existing behavior
>> correct?
>
> I think that it is a bug. ie the number should be EM_COLDFIRE.
The GNU tools never generate EM_COLDFIRE. I think some non-GNU tools
do.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery