[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Correct ELF machine for coldfire?

From: Daniel Jacobowitz
Subject: Re: Correct ELF machine for coldfire?
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:22:17 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11)

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 02:32:46PM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>> We are compiling for Coldfire CFV4E target. Binutils seems to want to
>> set the ELF header em_machine field to EM_68K with about half a dozen
>> options set to indicate instruction set and so forth.
>> Should this be getting set to EM_COLDFIRE, or is the existing behavior
>> correct?
> I think that it is a bug.  ie the number should be EM_COLDFIRE.

The GNU tools never generate EM_COLDFIRE.  I think some non-GNU tools

Daniel Jacobowitz

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]