[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to mis
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols |
Date: |
13 Oct 2008 15:28:45 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-13 15:28
-------
Subject: Re: binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so
due to missing symbols
Hi Kirill,
> This change provokes text relocations.
Sorry - please could you explain what that means and why it is undesirable ?
> I guess, PIC version of libiberty.a should be used.
A PIC version of libiberty is not normally generated even if configure
with --enable-shared...
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6937
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- Re: [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, (continued)
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/04
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/07
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/09
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/09
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/10
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/10
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols,
nickc at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ldv at altlinux dot org, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ldv at altlinux dot org, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/14
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2008/10/14
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/22
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/22
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/22