[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to mis
From: |
ldv at altlinux dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols |
Date: |
13 Oct 2008 22:56:21 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From ldv at altlinux dot org 2008-10-13 22:56
-------
(In reply to comment #10)
> > I guess, PIC version of libiberty.a should be used.
>
> A PIC version of libiberty is not normally generated even if configure
> with --enable-shared...
This is not a problem: the PIC version should be used iff it is built.
There is an appropriate configure check for PICFLAG in bfd/configure.in already.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6937
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, (continued)
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/07
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/09
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/09
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/10
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/10
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols,
ldv at altlinux dot org <=
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ldv at altlinux dot org, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/14
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2008/10/14
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/22
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/22
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/22