bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/10413] New: Does -j sectname do anything useful?


From: martyleisner at yahoo dot com
Subject: [Bug binutils/10413] New: Does -j sectname do anything useful?
Date: 19 Jul 2009 00:00:10 -0000

I would expect something like:

objdump -h -j .data /bin/ls

would dump only the header info of the .data section...it seems to dump all 
sections

I have a patch (with respect to the recent snapshot of 2.19.51) which does
does:
address@hidden:/usr/local/obj/binutils-2.19.51/binutils$ ./objdump -h -j .data
/bin/ls 

/bin/ls:     file format elf64-x86-64

Sections:
Idx Name          Size      VMA               LMA               File off  Algn
 23 .data         000001d0  000000000061a2e0  000000000061a2e0  0001a2e0  2**5
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA

which I expect.

(I don't see how to add a patch yet to a bug)

-- 
           Summary: Does -j sectname do anything useful?
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: binutils
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: martyleisner at yahoo dot com
                CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10413

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]