[Bug ld/11175] ld marks destructor hidden global

[amodra at gmail dot com]

------- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com  2010-01-15 13:55 
-------
HJ, I don't understand your point in comment #3.
If your 9679 testcase isn't valid C then you had no reason to apply your 9679
patch.  If your 9679 testcase is valid (and I think it is), then I believe the
link error prior to your 9679 patch is simply due to a gcc bug.  gcc ought to
only generate an R_X86_64_PC32 reference to a function when the function is
known to be local, and since a weak symbol can be overridden there is no
guarantee that it is local.

In reply to comment #4:  Of course.  My comment #2 is about the case when a
strong global defined symbol exists.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11175

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.