[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name |
Date: |
28 Jan 2010 15:26:36 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-01-28 15:26
-------
Hi H.J.
> Should we set exit_status to 1 when issuing a warning? Thanks.
Yup. Fixed. I have checked the patch in along with a couple of fixes to the
testsuites for tests that were affected by the change.
Cheers
Nick
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11225
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/11225] New: objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/01/27
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name,
nickc at redhat dot com <=