[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/11416] New: a small miscode in binutils/readelf.c
From: |
aflyhorse at foxmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/11416] New: a small miscode in binutils/readelf.c |
Date: |
22 Mar 2010 15:20:52 -0000 |
on line 6197 to 6205:
unsigned char buf[5];
unsigned int i, len;
unsigned long offset;
for (i = 0; i < 9; i++)
{
GET_OP (buf[i]);
if ((buf[i] & 0x80) == 0)
break;
}
An obviously small wrong definition on the size of buf, which will cause
cc1.exe to treat warnings as errors.
Change size [5] to [9], am I right?
(Reported to gcc but been reoriented to here)
--
Summary: a small miscode in binutils/readelf.c
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: aflyhorse at foxmail dot com
CC: aflyhorse at foxmail dot com,bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-mingw32
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-mingw32
GCC target triplet: x86_64-w64-mingw32
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11416
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/11416] New: a small miscode in binutils/readelf.c,
aflyhorse at foxmail dot com <=