[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA
From: |
ian at airs dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA |
Date: |
19 Aug 2010 23:00:12 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2010-08-19 23:00 -------
The patch is not correct in general, because the paddr_ field of segments is
not
set in general at the point where it is tested. It will be set when a linker
script is used, but not by default. The paddr_ field is set when
Layout::set_segment_offsets calls set_section_addresses, but not before.
Your patch would probably be correct if it tested something like
seg1->are_addresses_set() ? seg1->paddr() : seg1->first_section_load_address()
Want to try that?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11899
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug gold/11899] New: segments not sorted by LMA, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/08/10
- [Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/08/10
- [Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/08/10
- [Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA,
ian at airs dot com <=
- [Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/08/20
- [Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/08/20
- [Bug gold/11899] segments not sorted by LMA, ian at airs dot com, 2010/08/23