bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug ld/12001] Linker includes archive members when symbols therein have


From: nickc at redhat dot com
Subject: [Bug ld/12001] Linker includes archive members when symbols therein have already been defined
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:47:54 +0000

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12001

Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |nickc at redhat dot com
         AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot   |nickc at redhat dot com
                   |redhat.com                  |

--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> 2010-10-28 13:47:43 
UTC ---
Hi Mark,

  I have uploaded a possible patch to LD for this problem.  I assume that a
similar patch to GOLD will also be possible, but I have not looked into this
yet.  

  In the course of checking the patch I found one linker testcase that broke:
default-script2.  Looking at the test, it seems to me that the patched linker
is actually correct in this instance.  The test uses a linker script that looks
like this:

  _START = DEFINED(_START) ? _START : 0x9000000;
  SECTIONS
  {
    . = _START;
    .text : {*(.text)}
    /DISCARD/ : {*(*)}
  }

It then checks to see that the .text symbol has been given an address of
0x90000000 despite the fact that "-defsym _START=0x8000000" has been passed on
the command line.  The patched linker sets the address to 0x80000000, which I
think is right.

  Does anyone have any comments before I look at creating a patch for GOLD ?

Cheers
  Nick

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]