[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804

--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-05-27 20:09:13 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > I still got
> > 
> > g++ -W -Wall    -Werror -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> > -fmerge-constants -g -O2   -o incremental_test_4 -Wl,--incremental-full
> > -Bgcctestdir/ two_file_test_1.o two_file_test_1b.o two_file_test_tmp.o
> > two_file_test_main.o
> > gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 't1_2()'
> > gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here
> > gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 't1a()'
> > gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here
> > gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 'f10()'
> > gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here
> > ....
> 
> This doesn't make sense to me -- two_file_test_2.o isn't mentioned on the link
> line at all, and the linker shouldn't be looking at it. At this step in the
> Makefile rule, two_file_test_tmp.o should be a copy of two_file_test_2_v1.o, 
> so
> it does make sense that two_file_test_2.o would have duplicate symbols, but I
> don't see how it's being linked given that command.
> 
> I thought maybe I forgot to check in the regenerated testsuite/Makefile.in, 
> but
> I checked and it looks OK in cvs. Did your build somehow skip regenerating
> testsuite/Makefile?
> 

I didn't do anything special. Can you try to build binutils
with GCC 4.5 on Linux/x86-64?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.