[Bug ld/13561] AIX link failure: RLD address not contained in section

[ka5427-536 at online dot de]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561

--- Comment #3 from ka5427-536 at online dot de 2012-01-05 08:37:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, ka5427-536 at online dot de wrote:
> 
> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561
> > 
> > --- Comment #1 from ka5427-536 at online dot de 2012-01-05 08:11:26 UTC ---
> > address@hidden> nm -C partial.o
> > 
> >  00000148 T .bar()
> >  00000000 T .foo()
> >  00000078 W .std::auto_ptr<int>::auto_ptr(int*)
> >  000000d8 W .std::auto_ptr<int>::~auto_ptr()
> >           U .operator delete(void*)
> >           U .operator new(unsigned long)
> >  100002f0 d .data
> >  100002a0 d .data
> >  00000148 t .text
> >  00000000 t .text
> >  1000037c d TOC
> >  100002f0 D _GLOBAL__F_bar.cpp_9A43FB88_F8600D79
> >  100002a0 D _GLOBAL__F_foo.cpp_9647360E_2B1D02D2
> >  10000358 D bar()
> >  10000358 d bar()
> >  10000334 d foo()
> >  10000334 D foo()
> >  10000340 W std::auto_ptr<int>::auto_ptr(int*)
> >  1000034c W std::auto_ptr<int>::~auto_ptr()
> > 
> > Mmmmh - I cannot relate the failing RLD address of 0x10000364 to the nm 
> > output
> > …
> 
> Addresses look weird for a partially linked object.
> Did GNU 'ld -r' ever worked for AIX ?
> 
> Tristan.

Yes - partial linking normally works for me on AIX. But there are cases - like
this one reported here - where it fails. In my impression this is related to
virtual functions, especially virtual destructors in conjunction with
templates.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.