[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/13937] Incorrect opcode generated for FDIVRP
From: |
zbyszek at mimuw dot edu.pl |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/13937] Incorrect opcode generated for FDIVRP |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Apr 2012 06:23:58 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13937
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jurkiewicz <zbyszek at mimuw dot edu.pl>
2012-04-03 06:23:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> See http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.22/as/i386_002dMnemonics.html .
The documentation says:
Several x87 instructions, `fadd', `fdiv', `fdivp', `fdivr', `fdivrp', `fmul',
`fsub', `fsubp', `fsubr' and `fsubrp', are implemented in AT&T System V/386
assembler with different mnemonics from those in Intel IA32 specification.
In the case of fdivrp it is not true. The mnemonic IS ACCEPTED, but the
generated opcodes for fdivrp and fdivp (when called without arguments)
are swapped. No other assembler does this.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gas/13937] New: Incorrect opcode generated for FDIVRP, zbyszek at mimuw dot edu.pl, 2012/04/02
- [Bug gas/13937] Incorrect opcode generated for FDIVRP, ian at airs dot com, 2012/04/02
- [Bug gas/13937] Incorrect opcode generated for FDIVRP,
zbyszek at mimuw dot edu.pl <=
- [Bug gas/13937] Incorrect opcode generated for FDIVRP, amodra at gmail dot com, 2012/04/03
- [Bug gas/13937] Incorrect opcode generated for FDIVRP, zbyszek at mimuw dot edu.pl, 2012/04/03
- [Bug gas/13937] Incorrect opcode generated for FDIVRP, ian at airs dot com, 2012/04/03
- [Bug gas/13937] Incorrect opcode generated for FDIVRP, zbyszek at mimuw dot edu.pl, 2012/04/04
- [Bug gas/13937] Incorrect opcode generated for FDIVRP, ian at airs dot com, 2012/04/04