Re: Assumption about size of bfd_vma in opcodes/arm-dis.c

[nick clifton]

Hi Mathias,
> In multiple places in opcodes/arm-dis.c there is an implcit assumption
> that bfd_vma has the same size as an int. See for example lines
> 2014-2033 in HEAD.
>
> This can cause a segfault e.g. if binutils is compiled on i386 with
> --enable-64-bit-bfd --target=arm-linux.

I am confused - how does this assumption cause a seg-fault ?

In the places where your patch changes bfd_vma to int, the value is 
being passed to print_addres_func(), which expects a bfd_vma parameter. 
so I fail to see why there is a problem.

Cheers
  Nick