[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/17099] New: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24.51.20140628 assertion
From: |
david.majnemer at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/17099] New: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24.51.20140628 assertion fail coff-i386.c:509 |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:20:24 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17099
Bug ID: 17099
Summary: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24.51.20140628 assertion fail
coff-i386.c:509
Product: binutils
Version: 2.25 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: david.majnemer at gmail dot com
$ cat t.s
.text
.def @feat.00;
.scl 3;
.type 0;
.endef
.globl @feat.00
@feat.00 = 1
.def _fun;
.scl 2;
.type 32;
.endef
.globl _fun
.align 16, 0x90
_fun: # @fun
# BB#0:
calll _ext_fun
retl
.globl _ext_fun
_ext_fun = 0
$ ~/binutils-gdb/gas/as-new t.s -o t.o
$ ~/binutils-gdb/ld/ld-new t.o
~/binutils-gdb/ld/ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24.51.20140628 assertion fail
coff-i386.c:509
I'm guess that ld doesn't like something about that absolute symbol reference,
perhaps as formed an invalid relocation?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug binutils/17099] New: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.24.51.20140628 assertion fail coff-i386.c:509,
david.majnemer at gmail dot com <=