[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/17288] sh64 incremental link does not set flags in ELF header
From: |
dhowells at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/17288] sh64 incremental link does not set flags in ELF header |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:40:20 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17288
--- Comment #1 from David Howells <dhowells at redhat dot com> ---
The binutils was built from the 2.24 tarball plus a patch bringing it up to git
release cab6c3ee9785f072a373afe31253df0451db93cf.
Build configuration:
+ LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro '
+ ../binutils-2.24/configure \
--disable-dependency-tracking \
--disable-silent-rules \
--enable-checking \
--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu \
--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu \
--target=sh64-linux-elf \
--program-prefix=sh64-linux-gnu- \
--disable-shared \
--disable-install_libbfd \
--with-sysroot=/usr/sh64-linux-gnu/sys-root \
--enable-64-bit-bfd
(I've removed the flags that set the various installation paths and the bug
url)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/17288] New: sh64 incremental link does not set flags in ELF header, dhowells at redhat dot com, 2014/08/18
- [Bug ld/17288] sh64 incremental link does not set flags in ELF header,
dhowells at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug ld/17288] sh64 incremental link does not set flags in ELF header, kkojima at rr dot iij4u.or.jp, 2014/08/18
- [Bug ld/17288] sh64 incremental link does not set flags in ELF header, dhowells at redhat dot com, 2014/08/19
- [Bug ld/17288] sh64 incremental link does not set flags in ELF header, nickc at redhat dot com, 2014/08/20
- [Bug ld/17288] sh64 incremental link does not set flags in ELF header, kkojima at rr dot iij4u.or.jp, 2014/08/20
- [Bug ld/17288] sh64 incremental link does not set flags in ELF header, dhowells at redhat dot com, 2014/08/21