bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug gold/19177] gold doesn't handle R_386_GOT32X relocation without bas


From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gold/19177] gold doesn't handle R_386_GOT32X relocation without base register
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:23:53 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19177

--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot 
gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu <address@hidden>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3043c1aba16b1b5bfdf6813d90ec661988ddfa3f

commit 3043c1aba16b1b5bfdf6813d90ec661988ddfa3f
Author: H.J. Lu <address@hidden>
Date:   Wed Oct 28 09:15:17 2015 -0700

    Check R_386_GOT32/R_386_GOT32X without base register

    The R_386_GOT32 and R_386_GOT32X relocations may be used without base
    register:

        movl    address@hidden, %eax

    Its calculation is G + A, instead of G + A - GOT, and it can only used
    to generate non-PIC executable.  Include the .got.plt section address
    for R_386_GOT32 and R_386_GOT32X relocations without base register.
    Don't allow R_386_GOT32 and R_386_GOT32X relocations without base
    register when making a PIC output.

        PR gold/19177
        * i386.cc (Target_i386::Relocate::relocate): Check R_386_GOT32
        and R_386_GOT32X relocations without base register.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]