bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/1198] Segfault when executing objdump on a special file...


From: lionel_debroux at yahoo dot fr
Subject: [Bug binutils/1198] Segfault when executing objdump on a special file...
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 20:55:18 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1198

Lionel Debroux <lionel_debroux at yahoo dot fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Lionel Debroux <lionel_debroux at yahoo dot fr> ---
Alright, I've now been able to spend some time setting up 32-bit Cygwin on a
Windows computer (Win 7 x64 VM), and building several binutils versions :)

The results are as follows:
* for sanity checking: binutils 2.16.1a, successfully built by Cygwin GCC
5.2.0, segfaults on the file I posted 10 years ago if its prefix is
/tmp/m68k-coff-binutils or /tmp/m68k-coff-binu2161, but reports invalid
relocation data and exits with proper 1 value if the prefix is /home/<7-letter
username>/prefix/m68k-coff-binutils2161.
* binutils 2.25.1 (need to use -i for make) doesn't barf, when installed at
/tmp/m68k-coff-binutils, /tmp/m68k-coff-binu2251 or /home/<7-letter
username>/prefix/m68k-coff-binutils2251: they print that the file contains
invalid relocation data, as binutils 2.16 did under Linux (with unknown prefix)
10 years ago.
* binutils 2.21.1, 2.22, 2.23.2 don't build under that setup, even with make
-i;
* binutils 2.24 didn't barf at /home/<7-letter
username>/prefix/m68k-coff-binutils224, I haven't tested
/tmp/m68k-coff-binutils or /tmp/m68k-coff-binut224.

I suppose I'll mark this bug resolved, all the more the m68k-coff
(m68k-unknown-coff) target was made unsupported for gas years ago :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]