[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries
From: |
Tristan Gingold |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Apr 2016 09:11:41 +0200 |
> On 05 Apr 2016, at 16:05, nickc at redhat dot com <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19872
>
> --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
> Hi Tristan,
>
>> you have committed unrelated chunks (pe-dll, aarch64/simulator.c)
>
>
> Argh! Why does git do this ? I am sure that I only "git add"ed the
> changes the bfd/ directory, so why did it add the others ?
>
> This is really starting to piss me off.. :-(
Mistakes happen :-(
> Oh well. Do you know how I can partially undo a commit ?
I think it’s over.
Anyway, I see you already committed the ChangeLog for the other chunks.
Tristan.
- [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2016/04/04
- [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental, nickc at redhat dot com, 2016/04/04
- [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental, gingold at adacore dot com, 2016/04/04
- [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental, nickc at redhat dot com, 2016/04/05
- Re: [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental,
Tristan Gingold <=
- [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental, gingold at adacore dot com, 2016/04/06
- [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental, address@hidden, 2016/04/06