[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/20196] Opcode regressions for e6500
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/20196] Opcode regressions for e6500 |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jun 2016 08:46:55 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20196
Sebastian Huber <address@hidden> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Huber <address@hidden> ---
Thanks a lot for this really quick fix.
In addition, thanks for adding the consistency checks to the sync L, E in
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7b9341139a693eac8d316275004b2d752b1f0cb8
Thus, error 3 and 4 are actually errors on our side thanks to the vague e6500
reference manual. The Power ISA 2.07 document clarified this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gas/20196] New: Opcode regressions for e6500, address@hidden, 2016/06/03
- [Bug gas/20196] Opcode regressions for e6500, address@hidden, 2016/06/03
- [Bug gas/20196] Opcode regressions for e6500, bergner at vnet dot ibm.com, 2016/06/03
- [Bug gas/20196] Opcode regressions for e6500, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2016/06/03
- [Bug gas/20196] Opcode regressions for e6500, bergner at vnet dot ibm.com, 2016/06/03
- [Bug gas/20196] Opcode regressions for e6500, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2016/06/03
- [Bug gas/20196] Opcode regressions for e6500, bergner at vnet dot ibm.com, 2016/06/03
- [Bug gas/20196] Opcode regressions for e6500,
address@hidden <=