[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/20823] New: invalid "tail +16c" still used
From: |
ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/20823] New: invalid "tail +16c" still used |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2016 06:17:27 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20823
Bug ID: 20823
Summary: invalid "tail +16c" still used
Product: binutils
Version: 2.28 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 9634
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9634&action=edit
change all "tail +16c" to "tail -c +16"
When porting patches from binutils2.24 to latest 2.27, I found some old
mistakes still existed. "tail" now treat operands with leading '+' as file
names, as POSIX has required since 2001. But there were still some uses of
"tail +16c" in binutils. Attached patch change all "tail +16c" to valid "tail
+c", is that ok?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/20823] New: invalid "tail +16c" still used,
ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn <=
- [Bug ld/20823] invalid "tail +16c" still used, ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn, 2016/11/15
- [Bug ld/20823] invalid "tail +16c" still used, ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn, 2016/11/27
- [Bug ld/20823] invalid "tail +16c" still used, ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn, 2016/11/27
- [Bug ld/20823] invalid "tail +16c" still used, amodra at gmail dot com, 2016/11/27
- [Bug ld/20823] invalid "tail +16c" still used, ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn, 2016/11/27
- [Bug ld/20823] invalid "tail +16c" still used, ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn, 2016/11/28
- [Bug ld/20823] invalid "tail +16c" still used, amodra at gmail dot com, 2016/11/28
- [Bug ld/20823] invalid "tail +16c" still used, ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn, 2016/11/28