[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug ld/21402] i386: indirect5 failures

From: amodra at gmail dot com
Subject: [Bug ld/21402] i386: indirect5 failures
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 05:09:29 +0000


Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
xfail is wrong.  The testcases are not artificial, but are distilled from
real-world code.  The classical example is where "time" or "times" is defined
as a variable in an executable, clashing with functions of the same name in

Comment #2 even gives a clue as how to properly fix the problem.  "bar" does
*not* need to be dynamic have a GOT entry initialized to its address.  How do
you think GOT entries are initialized for local symbols?

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]