bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so


From: james.reynolds at cristie dot com
Subject: [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 08:41:44 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698

James Reynolds <james.reynolds at cristie dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |james.reynolds at cristie dot 
com

--- Comment #12 from James Reynolds <james.reynolds at cristie dot com> ---
(In reply to address@hidden from comment #11)
> On 22 Sep 2014, at 12:58, markus at trippelsdorf dot de
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
> > 
> > --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
> > (In reply to address@hidden from comment #9)
> >> Yes, but the behaviour has changed due to these lines (from the patch):
> >> 
> >> +#if BFD_SUPPORTS_PLUGINS
> >> +static const char *plugin_target = "plugin";
> >> +#else
> >> static const char *plugin_target = NULL;
> >> +#endif
> > 
> > Is BFD_SUPPORTS_PLUGINS defined on IBM AIX?
> 
> That's a property of the host, so yes it is defined at least if you build on
> linux.
> (I haven't tested on aix, but it supports dlfcn.h I think).

This has been raised separately: bug 19153. I've added a temporary patch that
backs out some of this but it only really applies to my use case (cross
compiling to AIX).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]