[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c
|
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
|
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:16:47 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21786
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Ned,
> I did see a crash in coff64-rs6000 as well, so that may need to use the new
> safe functions.
Ah - thanks for pointing that out. I have now checked in an additional patch
to cover coff64-rs6000.c.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/21786] New: Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c, ned at forallsecure dot com, 2017/07/18
- [Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c, ned at forallsecure dot com, 2017/07/18
- [Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c, ned at forallsecure dot com, 2017/07/18
- [Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2017/07/19
- [Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c, nickc at redhat dot com, 2017/07/19
- [Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c, ned at forallsecure dot com, 2017/07/19
- [Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2017/07/19
- [Bug binutils/21786] Stack-buffer-overflow in {coff,coff64}-rs6000.c,
nickc at redhat dot com <=