bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug gold/22969] New: Add support for R_AARCH64_TLSLE_LDST8_TPREL_LO12 r


From: peter.smith at linaro dot org
Subject: [Bug gold/22969] New: Add support for R_AARCH64_TLSLE_LDST8_TPREL_LO12 relocation.
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:17:20 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22969

            Bug ID: 22969
           Summary: Add support for R_AARCH64_TLSLE_LDST8_TPREL_LO12
                    relocation.
           Product: binutils
           Version: unspecified
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: gold
          Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
          Reporter: peter.smith at linaro dot org
                CC: ian at airs dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

In a recent change to LLVM (https://reviews.llvm.org/D44355) an attempt was
made to fold the add and the ldr in the sequence:

mrs x1, TPIDR_EL0
add x2, x1, :tprel_hi12:local_exec_var
add x3, x2, :tprel_lo12_nc:local_exec_var
ldr w0, [x3]

to:

mrs x1, TPIDR_EL0
add x2, x1, :tprel_hi12:local_exec_var
ldr w0, [x2, :tprel_lo12_nc:local_exec_var]

Unfortunately for this to work support is needed for the
R_AARCH_TLSLE_LDST8_TPREL_LO12 relocation that 
ldr w0, [x2, :tprel_lo12_nc:local_exec_var] uses.

It looks like only R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_LO12 is supported in binutils
trunk (gold and bfd right now). It would be nice to add support for that
relocation to enable the relaxation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]