bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug ld/23567] much larger static binaries compared to a few months ago


From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Subject: [Bug ld/23567] much larger static binaries compared to a few months ago
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 11:20:12 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Felix von Leitner from comment #4)
> Hey Nick, thanks for the quick help!
> 
> With -z noseparate-code I'm down to 9512 bytes. That is much better but
> still more than gold produces. And looking at the binary in a hex editor
> still shows a ton of padding bytes after .text and .data.
> 

Isn't 9512 bytes the same size as in May?

-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root         9512 May  2 20:09 /opt/diet/bin/diet

If you want a smaller binary size than in May, please open a new bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]